DE sign: (Deconstructing in-order to find new meanings)
A blogging space about my personal interests; was made during training in Stockholm #Young Leaders Visitors Program #Ylvp08 it developed into a social bookmarking blog.
I studied #Architecture; interested in#Design #Art #Education #Urban Design #Digital-media #social-media #Inhabited-Environments #Contemporary-Cultures #experimentation #networking #sustainability & more =)
Please Enjoy, feedback recommended.
p.s. sharing is usually out of interest not Blind praise. This is neither sacred nor political.
Dame Zaha Mohammad Hadid, DBE (Arabic: زها حديد Zahā Ḥadīd; 31 October 1950 – 31 March 2016) was an Iraqi architect. She was the first woman and the first Muslim to receive the Pritzker Architecture Prize, winning it in 2004. She received the Stirling Prizein 2010 and 2011. In 2012, she was created a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire and in 2015 she became the first woman to be awarded the RIBA Gold Medal in her own right.[1]
Born in Baghdad Iraq in 1950, Zaha Hadid commenced her college studies at the American University in Beirut, in the field of mathematics. She moved to London in 1972 to study architecture at the Architectural Association and upon graduation in 1977, she joined the Office of Metropolitan Architecture (OMA). She also taught at the Architectural Association (AA) with OMA collaborators Rem Koolhaas and Elia Zenghelis.
She began her own practice in London in 1980 and won the prestigious competition for the Hong Kong Peak Club, a leisure and recreational center in 1983. Painting and drawing, especially in her early period, are important techniques of investigation for her design work. Ever since her 1983 retrospective exhibition at the AA in London, her architecture has been shown in exhibitions worldwide and many of her works are held in important museum collections.
Known as an architect who consistently pushes the boundaries of architecture and urban design, her work experiments with new spatial concepts intensifying existing urban landscapes and encompassing all fields of design, from the urban scale to interiors and furniture.
She is well-known for some of her seminal built works, such at the Vitra Fire Station (1993), Weil am Rhein, Germany, the Mind Zone at the Millennium Dome (1999) Greenwich, UK, a ski jump (2002) in Innsbruck, Austria and the Rosenthal Center for Contemporary Art (2003) in Cincinnati, Ohio. Parallel with her private practice, Hadid has continued to be involved in academics, holding chairs and guest professorships at Harvard University, Yale University, the University of Illinois at Chicago, Columbia University, the University of Visual Arts in Hamburg and the University of Applied Arts in Vienna.
The Architecture of Zaha Hadid By Joseph Giovannini Architect and Critic
"Very few buildings can stand up to the Alps without retreating into modesty, but Zaha Hadid’s dynamic and lyrical Bergisel Ski Jump in Innsbruck, Austria, completed in 2002, confronts the surrounding mountains with an equivalent architectural majesty. At the top of a hill, the structure occupies the sky, a free-standing silhouette. Within the bowl of a valley ringed by hills and vertiginous mountains, the turning form of the clubhouse seems to gather and funnel the aerial energy of the mountainscape to the long, bowed ramp that lofts jumpers toward the city below. Hadid designed the sweeping structure from top to bottom as one fluid gesture that both summarizes the surrounding landscape in a sweep of movement, and sends skiers down a jump conceived in an act of fluid geometric empathy akin to flight.As in Michelangelo’s Sistine Ceiling, where God nearly touches Adam’s hand to spark life, Hadid has provided the index finger that makes a visual connection between the sky and the ground. Here the spark of life is completed in the jump. The sensuous forms visualize and poeticize the leap, spiraling the mountainscape, sky and ground into a fluid continuum.
Air is Hadid’s element: she floats buildings that reside aloft. At a time, in the early 1980s, when architects were concerned about manifesting the path of gravity through buildings, Hadid invented a new anti-gravitational visual physics. She suspended weight in the same way dramatists suspend disbelief. In 1983, she won a much-published international competition for a sports club on the Peak above Hong Kong with a crystalline structure that seemed to explode from the mountainside, creating in the fragmentary fall-out a structure that evaded any sense of a unitary whole. Eruption rather than gravity was the defining force directing the path of a building that thrived in the air. Floor planes were no longer extruded up from a single foundation, stacked atop one another, but beamed out in different directions, shifting as they rose in a complex section. A highway curved through the building in the space between the splayed, airborne volumes.
Historically, the proposal broke new ground in the field, and did so radically. As original to architecture as the twelve-tone scale once was to music, the design represented architecture of a wholly different and very unexpected order. Whatever the metaphor—explosion, implosion, fragmentation—the design favored open forms rather than closed, hermetic volumes; it offered breathing porosity rather than sealed fortification. The design quickly proved a foundational thesis for architecture, an unexpected precedent for shifting Modernism’s paradigm from simplicity to complexity. The theory behind the building moved away from modernism’s ideas of mass production, received typologies and the normative, to a more complex order of a kind that privileged the unique and the fragmentary. The scheme signaled a shift in sensibilities not only from truisms of the past but also from set tenets of industrial modernism, toward an indeterminate complexity sited on shifting ground somewhere between order and chaos.
In the 1980s, many people mistakenly believed that the Peak was influenced by the use of the computer. But the influence was historical, and in the context of the Pritzker Prize, awarded this year in St. Petersburg, coincidental. The imperial Russian capital was the seat of the Russian Avant-Garde artists who inspired Hadid very early in her career.
Vladimir Malevich, who pursued a mystic fourth dimension in his paintings and architectural schemes, had studied here, and he and his pupil El Lissitzky embarked on a remarkable journey into spatial mystery in the 1910s and ’20s. Their promising experiments were aborted by a Soviet state that adopted Soviet Realism in art as official policy, and a bombastic version of classicism in architecture.The flame of discovery went out for decades.
In the 1970s, however, Hadid, a student at the Architectural Association in London, took Malevich’s abstract compositions and, giving them scale and function, turned them into architectural projects that gave life again to the vision. Courageously she set off on a course to realize ideas, such as fragmentation and layering, never built by the Suprematists themselves. Inspired by Malevich’s ethereal paintings, she took up the brush as a design tool, and for her, painted tableaux became a locus of spatial invention. With this methodology, applied in the elusive pursuit of almost intangible form, she escaped the prejudice latent in such design tools as the T-square and parallel rule, traditionally used by architects. Hadid came off the drawing boards, much as Frank Gehry did when, influenced by artists, he left behind the usual drawings to conceive his buildings sculpturally, often with his hands. Hadid abandoned the regularity of the T-square and parallel rule in buildings emancipated from the right angle..."
(CNN) Frank Gehry: "She was a great architect and a great friend. I will miss her."
Richard Rogers: "Zaha Hadid was a radical genius -- an architect far ahead of her time. I loved Zaha and will miss her"
Norman Foster: "I think it was Zaha's triumph to go beyond the beautiful graphic visions of her sculptural approach to architecture into reality that so upset some of her critics. She was an individual of great courage, conviction and tenacity. It is rare to find these qualities tied to a free creative spirit. That is why her loss is so profound and her example so inspirational. And, besides, she was my dear friend."
One of the world’s greatest architects, Zaha Hadid inspired a generation. Following the sad news of her death, the RA’s Head of Architecture and two fellow architects reflect on a visionary career.
Zaha Hadid RA sadly died in Miami following a heart attack on Thursday 31 March, aged 65. Announcing the news, the President of the Royal Academy, Christopher Le Brun, said: “We are shocked and saddened by the news of the passing of Dame Zaha Hadid RA. She was a visionary architect who has inspired a generation and this is a great loss for the world of architecture.” Here, Kate Goodwin, Alan Stanton RA and Peter Cook RA pay tribute.
Kate Goodwin, RA Head of Architecture
The news of Zaha Hadid RA’s sudden death in Miami has sent ripples across the world. Her influence and renown stretched far beyond the architectural community, with her buildings – perhaps most famously, London’s Olympic Aquatic Centre – capturing popular imagination. This Iraq-born architect inspired first with her paintings and drawings, and when she was finally given the opportunity to build she produced work which was truly visionary.
Her architecture is keenly intellectual and equally emotionally and creatively charged. Elected a Royal Academician in 2005, she is pioneering figure; the only woman to receive the Pritzker Prize (2004) and the RIBA Gold Medal this year, again the first time to a woman in her own right. As fellow Academician and long-time friend Peter Cook said in his Gold Medal citation of Zaha, she was “larger than life, bold as brass and certainly on the case. Our Heroine.”
Alan Stanton RA, architect and Chair of the Architecture Committee
Zaha Hadid was a force of nature. Her creative power and strong personality pushed architecture into a new territory that, not only produced seminal buildings, but raised public awareness and encouraged debate about the very nature of architecture.
Although Zaha had the courage to work “on the edge” of mainstream architecture (which she freely admitted was the best place to be) over recent years her practice received an increasing number of accolades and important commissions and she was building more and more. The news of her death will have come as a profound shock to architects everywhere and her presence within the world of architecture will be hugely missed.
Peter Cook RA, architect
Peter Cook RA wrote the following tribute in February, when Hadid was presented with the RIBA’s 2016 Royal Gold Medal.
In our current culture of ticking every box, surely Zaha Hadid succeeds, since (to quote the Royal Gold Medal criteria) she is someone “who has made a significant contribution to the theory or practice of architecture… for a substantial body of work rather than for work which is currently fashionable.” Indeed her work, though full of form, style and unstoppable mannerism, possesses a quality that some of us might refer to as an impeccable “eye”: which we would claim is a fundamental in the consideration of special architecture and is rarely satisfied by mere “fashion”.
And surely her work is special. For three decades now, she has ventured where few would dare: if Paul Klee took a line for a walk, then Zaha took the surfaces that were driven by that line out for a virtual dance and then deftly folded them over and then took them out for a journey into space. In her earlier, “spiky” period there was already a sense of vigour that she shared with her admired Russian Suprematists and Constructivists – attempting with them to capture that elusive dynamic of movement at the end of the machine age.
Necessarily having to disperse effort through a studio production, rather than being a lone artist, she cottoned–on to the potential of the computer to turn space upon itself. Indeed there is an Urban Myth that suggests that the very early Apple Mac “boxes” were still crude enough to plot the mathematically unlikely – and so Zaha with her mathematics background seized upon this and made those flying machine projections of the Hong Kong Peak project and the like. Meanwhile, with paintings and special small drawings Zaha continued to lead from the front. She has also been smart enough to pull in some formidable computational talent without being phased by its ways.
Thus the evolution of the “flowing” rather than spikey architecture crept up upon us in stages, as did the scale of her commissions, but in most cases, they remained clear in identity and control. When you entered the Fire Station at Vitra, you were conscious of being inside one of those early drawings and yes, it could be done. Yet at perhaps its highest, those of us lucky enough to see the Heydar Aliyev Center in Baku in the flesh, can surely never have been in such a dream-like space, with its totality, its enormous internal ramp and dart-like lights seeming to have come from a vocabulary that lies so far beyond the normal architecture that we assess or rationalise.
Professor Chris Speed, Chair of Design Informatics, presents the fourth lecture in the 2014 Our Changing World series, entitled "Dancing with Data".
This talk speculates upon a future time in which objects will begin to interact with us in different ways. Such an enquiry is part of what is being described as an Internet of Things. The term, Internet of Things, refers to the technical and cultural shift that is anticipated as society moves to a ubiquitous form of computing in which every device is on, and every physical object is connected in some way to the Internet.
The focus of the talk is to anticipate a time when the scale of data that becomes associated with physical objects is so great that it allows unforeseen patterns and opportunities to be identified.
Recorded on 14 October 2014 at the University of Edinburgh's Appleton Tower.
في هذه
الفترة من الانتاج الاعلامي الغزير من جميع المصادر، ولكن حيث نسمع كل شيء
ما عدا رأي الشعب السوري، تقدّم “إلى سوريا” للشابات والشباب السوريين فرصة
التعبير عن أنفسهم
إن معارف المختصين والجردات و تحليل المختصين
من كل أنحاء العالم، كلها أشياء أساسية لا يمكن فصلها عن رأي اللاعبين
الحقيقيين للثورة وخاصة الشباب الذين يساهمون غالباً، في هذا السياق
المأساوي، بحياتهم لبناء المستقبل
أي مستقبل؟
لذلك تعرض “إلى سوريا” على كل واحد، السؤال التالي ما الذي يساعدكم على البقاء والحفاظ على الامل منذ بداية الثورة؟ بأي مستقبل تحلمون؟ وكيف تفكرون بإمكانية تحقيقه؟
هناك طريقتان للإجابة على هذا السؤال
ـ إما بواسطة نص،
ـ أو بواسطة صورة ( أو الإثنين معاً للذين يرغبون بربط كلماتهم بتصوّر ما
نص مع حريّة تعبير كاملة و مطلقة (رسالة، قصة، شعر، إلخ) وصورة مع
الامكانيات اللامحدودة للغة المرئية (رسوم، كاريكاتور، منحوتات، تصميم،
صور، ملصقات، إلخ)
الشروط
إجابة نصية= 200 كلمة كحد أقصى باللغة العربية أو 300 كلمة باللغة الفرنسية او الانكليزية.
300 dpi مع دقة jpg إجابة صورية= الابعاد القصوى للصورة: إرتفاع 20 سم ـ العرض 15سم، مسجّلة بقطع
تجدر الإشارة إلى أن المنشور سوف ينشر بالأبيض والأسود (مستوى
الرمادي):على المبتكر إذاً أن يأخذ بعين الاعتبار هذه المعطيات الاساسية في
تكوين اللون، إما من خلال العمل مباشرة على هذه الثنائية أو عبر اختيار
الالوان الملائمة في الاطار المفروض
نطلب من الجميع الالتزام بهذه الشروط لاسباب تتعلق بالتصميم الرسمي الذي علينا تسليمه للطابع.
من المستحسن تحديد الاسم او العائلة او اسم مستعار والعمر ومكان الاقامة الحالي والمعتاد (للنازحين والمنفيين
ستنشر الردود على الانترنت على موقع “إلى…” و مجموعة مختارة ستنشر (كتاب،
حجم 24ـ 18سم) باللغة العربية او الفرنسية او الانكليزية مع نشر أعمال
المؤتمر الاول لإلى…، إلى سوريا.01، اللذي سيقام في معهد العالم العربي في
باريس، في تشرين الاول المقبل
يجب ارسال النصوص والصور المقترحة بالبريد الالكتروني وذلك قبل ٧ تموز ٢٠١٣ على العنوان التالي
ila.alaati@gmail.com
نشكركم على تعريف اصدقائكم و معارفكم على هذه المبادرة. و ننتظر شهاداتكم بفارغ الصبر
Dans cette période de foisonnement médiatique de toutes origines mais
où l’on entend tout sauf l’opinion du peuple syrien, Ila Souria propose
aux jeunes syriennes et syriens de s’exprimer.
Les savoirs de spécialistes, les inventaires et état des lieux, les analyses d’expériences de par le monde,
toutes choses essentielles ne peuvent être dissociées de l’opinion
publique, et donc de celle des véritables acteurs de la révolution, en
particulier des jeunes, qui dans ce contexte tragique contribuent, de
leur vie souvent, à construire l’avenir .
Quel avenir ? Aussi, Ila Souria soumet à chacun la question suivante : Qu’est-ce qui vous aide à tenir et à garder espoir depuis le début de la révolution ? De quel avenir rêvez-vous ? Comment pensez-vous pouvoir le réaliser ?
Deux façons de répondre à cette interrogation : - soit par un texte, - soit par une image (soit les deux pour certains qui voudraient associer une représentation à leurs mots).
Texte avec une totale liberté d’expression (lettre, récit, poésie,
etc.) et image avec une infinité de possibilités de langages visuels
(dessins, caricatures, sculptures, maquettes, photographies, collages,
etc.).
Contraintes : Réponse textuelle = maximum de 200 mots en langue arabe et de 300 mots en langue française ou anglaise.
Réponse graphique = dimension maximum de l’image : hauteur 20 cm –
largeur 15 cm, enregistrée au format jpg avec une résolution de 300 dpi.
A noter que la publication sera éditée en noir et blanc (niveau de
gris) : au créateur donc de prendre en considération cette donnée
essentielle dans sa composition colorimétrique, soit en travaillant
directement dans cette bichromie soit en choisissant les “bonnes“
couleurs dans le cadre imposé.
Nous vous demandons à tous de
bien respecter ces contraintes pour des raisons pratiques liées à la
maquette graphique que nous aurons à remettre à l’imprimeur.
Il
est souhaitable d’indiquer les prénom et nom ou le pseudonyme, l’âge,
le lieu de vie actuel et habituel (pour les déplacés ou les exilés).
Les réponses seront publiées en ligne sur le site ILA… et une sélection
des réponses reçues sera publiée (livre, format 24x18cm) en arabe,
français et anglais avec une parution pour le premier colloque de ILA…,
Ilasouria.01, qui se déroulera à l’Institut du monde arabe à Paris en
octobre prochain.
Les textes et les images proposés devront
être adressés par mail à ila.alaati@gmail.com et cela impérativement
avant le 07 juillet 2013.
Merci de faire connaître cette initiative, à vos proches et connaissances. Nous attendons avec impatience vos témoignages !
There is no shortage of opinions in the media about the situation in
Syria. It seems everybody has something to say – but we’re not getting
to hear from the Syrians themselves. That is why Ila Souria is reaching
out to the young people of Syria, so their voices can be heard.
Specialists’ input, inventories and assessments of the state of affairs, analyses of pertinent experiences
around the world… all are essential ingredients that cannot be
dissociated from public opinion and the feedback of those who are
directly involved in the revolution—especially young people who, in this
tragic context, in many cases are giving their very lives to help build
the country’s future.
What kind of future lies ahead?
Ila Souria would like people to consider the following questions:
What has given you hope, and kept your hope alive, since the beginning
of the revolution? What kind of future do you dream of? How do you think
it can be achieved?
There are two ways to submit your answers: – in written format – in visual format (or both, for those who wish to combine images and words).
Your written contributions can take any form you like (letter, story,
poem, etc.) as can your visuals (drawings, caricatures, sculptures,
models, photographs, collages, etc.).
Conditions: Written contribution: Maximum of 200 words in Arabic or 300 words in French or English. Visual contribution: Maximum height of 20 cm and maximum width of 15 cm, submitted in JPG format, resolution 300 dpi.
Please note that the final document will be published in black and
white (grey scale). Creators should therefore take this into
consideration in their colour choices and composition, either by working
directly in black and white or by choosing an easily adaptable colour
palette. All contributors are asked to kindly adhere to these limits, which are required to meet practical printing considerations.
It is preferable to include your full name or pseudonym with your
contribution, as well as your age, your current place of residence and
your usual place of residence (for those who are displaced or in exile).
Contributions will be posted on the ILA website, and a selection will
be included in a book (24 cm x 18 cm) to be published in Arabic, French
and English. The book will be launched at the Ilasouria.01 symposium,
which will be held at the Institut du monde arabe in Paris in October
2013.
All contributions must be sent by email to ila.alaati@gmail.com by July 7, 2013, at the very latest.
Be sure to spread the word about this initiative to as many people as possible. We look forward to hearing from you!
Toyo
Ito was born on June 1, 1941 in Keijo (Seoul), Korea (Japanese). His
father was a business man with a special interest in the early ceramic
ware of the Yi Dynasty of Korea and Japanese style paintings. He also
was a sports fan of baseball and golf. In 1943, Ito, his mother, and his
two elder sisters moved back to Japan. Two years later, his father
returned to Japan as well, and they all lived in his father’s hometown
of Shimosuwa-machi in Nagano Prefecture. His father died in 1953, when
he was 12. After that the rest of family operated a miso (bean paste)
making factory. At present, all but one sister who is three years older
than Ito, have died. Ito established his own architecture office in 1971, and the
following year he married. His wife died in 2010. They had one daughter
who is now 40 and is editing Vogue Nippon. In his youth, Ito admits to not having a great interest in
architecture. There were several early influences however. His
grandfather was a lumber dealer, and his father liked to draw plans for
his friends’ houses. When Ito was a freshman in high school, his mother
asked the early Modernist architect, Yoshinobu Ashihara, who had just
returned to Japan from the U.S. where he worked at Marcel Breuer’s
office, to design their home in Tokyo. He was in the third grade of junior high school when he moved to
Tokyo and went to Hibiya High School. At the time, he never dreamed he
would become an architect—his passion was baseball. It was while
attending the University of Tokyo that architecture became his main
interest. For his undergraduate diploma design, he submitted a proposal
for the reconstruction of Ueno Park, which won the top prize of the
University of Tokyo. Toyo Ito began working in the firm of Kiyonori Kikutake &
Associates after he graduated from Tokyo University’s Department of
Architecture in 1965. By 1971, he was ready to start his own studio in
Tokyo, and named it Urban Robot (Urbot). In 1979, he changed the name to
Toyo Ito & Associates, Architects. He has received numerous international awards, including in 2010, the
22nd Praemium Imperiale in Honor of Prince Takamatsu; in 2006, The
Royal Institute of British Architects’ Royal Gold Medal; and in 2002,
the Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement for the 8th Venice Biennale
International Exhibition. All of his honors are listed in the fact
summary of this media kit. He has been a guest professor at the
University of Tokyo, Columbia University, the University of California,
Los Angeles, Kyoto University, Tama Art University, and in the spring
semester of 2012, he hosted an overseas studio for Harvard’s Graduate
School of Design, the first in Asia. His works have been the subject of museum exhibitions in England,
Denmark, the United States, France, Italy, Chile, Taiwan, Belgium, and
numerous cities in Japan. Publications by and about him have appeared in
all of those countries and more. He holds Honorary Fellowships in the
American Institute of Architects, Royal Institute of British Architects,
the Architecture Institute of Japan, the Tokyo Society of Architects
and Building Engineers, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. One of his first projects in 1971 was a home in a suburb of Tokyo.
Called “Aluminum House,” the structure consisted of wooden frame
completely covered in aluminum. Most of his early works were residences.
In 1976, he produced a home for his sister, who had recently lost her
husband. The house was called “White U” and generated a great deal of
interest in Ito’s works. It was demolished in 1997. Of most of his work
in the 1980’s, Ito explains that he was seeking to erase conventional
meaning from his works through minimalist tactics, developing lightness
in architecture that resembles air and wind. He calls the Sendai Mediatheque, completed in 2001 in Sendai City,
Miyagi, Japan, one of the high points of his career. In the Phaidon
book, Toyo Ito, he explains, “The Mediatheque differs from
conventional public buildings in many ways. While the building
principally functions as a library and art gallery, the administration
has actively worked to relax divisions between diverse programs,
removing fixed barriers between various media to progressively evoke an
image of how cultural facilities should be from now on. This openness is
the direct result of its simple structure, consisting of flat concrete
slabs (which are honey-comb steel plates with concrete) penetrated by 13
tubes. Walls on each floor are kept to an absolute minimum, allowing
the various functions to be freely distributed throughout the open areas
between the tubes.“ In delivering the Kenneth Kassler lecture at Princeton University in 2009, Ito explained his general thoughts on architecture: “The natural world is extremely complicated and variable, and its
systems are fluid – it is built on a fluid world. In contrast to this,
architecture has always tried to establish a more stable system. To be
very simplistic, one could say that the system of the grid was
established in the twentieth century. This system became popular
throughout the world, as it allowed a huge amount of architecture to be
built in a short period of time. However, it also made the world’s cities homogenous. One might even
say that it made the people living and working there homogenous too. In
response to that, over the last ten years, by modifying the grid
slightly I have been attempting to find a way of creating relationships
that bring buildings closer to their surroundings and environment.” Ito
amends that last thought to “their natural environment.” In the fashionable Omotesando area of Tokyo, Ito designed a building
in 2004 for TOD’S, an Italian shoe and handbag company, in which trees
provided a source of inspiration. The Ito office provides its own
description of the project: “Trees are natural objects that stand by themselves, and their shape
has an inherent structural rationality. The pattern of overlapping tree
silhouettes also generates a rational flow of forces. Having adapted the
branched tree diagram, the higher up the building, the thinner and more
numerous the branches become, with a higher ration of openings.
Similarly, the building unfolds as interior spaces with slightly
different atmospheres relating to the various intended uses. Rejecting the obvious distinctions between walls and opening, lines
and planes, two- and three dimensions, transparency and opaqueness, this
building is characterized by a distinctive type of abstractness. The
tree silhouette creates a new image with a constant tension generated
between the building’s symbolic concreteness and its abstractness. For
this project, we (Ito and his staff) intended to create a building that
through its architectural newness expresses both the vivid presence of a
fashion brand and strength in the cityscape that will withstand the
passage of time.” After designing critically-acclaimed buildings like Sendai
Mediatheque, Ito became an architect of international importance during
the early-2000s leading to projects throughout Asia, Europe, North
America and South America. Ito designed the Main Stadium for the 2009
World Games in Kaohsiung and the under-construction Taichung
Metropolitan Opera House, both in Taiwan. In Europe, Ito and his firm
renovated the façade of the Suites Avenue Apartments with striking
stainless steel waves and, in 2002, designed the celebrated temporary
Serpentine Pavilion Gallery in London’s Hyde Park. Other projects during
this time include the White O residence in Marbella, Chile and the
never-built University of California, Berkeley Art Museum/Pacific Film
Archive in California. Perhaps most important to Ito, however, are the projects in his home
country, made more pressing by the earthquake and tsunami of March 11,
2011. The disaster spurred Ito and a group of other Japanese architects
to develop the concept of “Home-for-All” communal space for survivors.
As Ito says in Toyo Ito - Forces of Nature published by Princeton Architectural Press: “The relief centers offer no privacy and scarcely enough room to
stretch out and sleep, while the hastily tacked up temporary housing
units are little more than rows of empty shells: grim living conditions
either way. Yet even under such conditions, people try to smile and make
do…. They gather to share and communicate in extreme circumstances – a
moving vision of community at its most basic. Likewise, what we see here
are very origins of architecture, the minimal shaping of communal
spaces. An architect is someone who can make such spaces for meager meals
show a little more humanity, make them a little more beautiful, a little
more comfortable.” For Ito, the fundamental tenets of modern architecture were called
into question by “Home-for-All.” He adds, “In the modern period,
architecture has been rated highest for its originality. As a result,
the most primal themes—why a building is made and for whom—have been
forgotten. A disaster zone, where everything is lost offers the
opportunity for us to take a fresh look, from the ground up, at what
architecture really is. ‘Home-for-all’ may consist of small buildings,
but it calls to the fore the vital question of what form architecture
should take in the modern era—even calling into question the most primal
themes, the very meaning of architecture.” The Pritzker Jury commented on Ito’s direct expression of his sense of social responsibility citing his work on “Home-for-All.” Recently, Ito has also thought of his legacy, as apparent by the
museum of architecture that bears his name on the small island of
Omishima in the Seto Inland Sea. Also designed by Ito, the museum opened
in 2011 and showcases his past projects as well as serving as a
workshop for young architects. Two buildings comprise the complex, the
main building “Steel Hut” and the nearby “Silver Hut,” which is a
recreation of the architect’s former home in Tokyo, built in 1984.